Method of determination of biogenic amines in wine by high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection (Type-IV)
OIV-MA-AS315-26 Method of determination of biogenic amines in wine by high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection
Type IV method
- Scope
This method is applicable to the analysis of biogenic amines in wines:
Amines |
Scope |
Histamine |
0.500 to 20 mg/L |
Methylamine |
0.250 to 20 mg/L |
Ethylamine |
0.450 to 20 mg/L |
Tyramine |
0.235 to 20 mg/L |
Putrescine |
0.098 to 20 mg/L |
Cadaverine |
0.480 to 20 mg/L |
Phenethylamine (or Phenylethylamine) |
0.096 to 20 mg/L |
Isoamylamine |
0.020 to 20 mg/L |
- Définition
The word biogenic means "created by life". The term "biogenic amines" is therefore given to all the amines produced by the metabolism of living, animal, plant, or microbial cells. Biogenic amines in wine are mainly of microbial origin. The main ones are histamine, putrescine, cadaverine, and tyramine.
- Principle
The biogenic amines studied here are primary, secondary, tertiary, aliphatic, or aromatic amines. However, only aromatic amines absorb UV. This is because the detection of molecules by UV requires the presence of a chromophore in the molecule, usually a sequence of conjugated double bonds.
In order to use the HPLC/DAD, it is necessary to couple a chromophore to the biogenic amines. To do so, diethyl 2-(ethoxymethylene)malonate (DEEMM) is used which, by alkylation, also known as derivatisation, enables biogenic amines to be obtained that are visible by diode array detector [1].
|
Derivatisation reaction |
NB: The yield of the derivatisation is calculated by adding an internal standard (2,4,6-Trimethylphenethylamine hydrochloride or 2,4,6 TPA). Each of the biogenic amines is quantified against a standard range.
- Reagents and Products
4.1. List of reagents
Product references:
|
Product |
CAS |
Purity |
4.1.1. |
Histamine |
51–45–6 |
≥99% |
4.1.2. |
Methylamine |
74–89–5 |
>99.5% |
4.1.3. |
Ethylamine |
557–66–4 |
97% |
4.1.4. |
Tyramine |
60–19–5 |
≥98% |
4.1.5. |
Putrescine (diaminobutane) |
333–93–7 |
≥98% |
4.1.6. |
Cadaverine (diaminopentane) |
1476–39–7 |
≥99% |
4.1.7. |
Phenethylamine |
64–04–0 |
≥99% |
4.1.8. |
Isoamylamine |
107-85-7 |
99% |
4.1.9. |
Boric acid |
10043-35-3 |
≥98.5% |
4.1.10. |
Sodium hydroxide |
1310-73-2 |
≥98% |
4.1.11. |
Sodium azide |
26628-22-8 |
≥99.5% |
4.1.12. |
2,4,6-Trimethylphenethylamine hydrochloride |
3167-10-0 |
97% |
4.1.13. |
DEEMM (Diethyl 2-(ethoxymethylene)malonate) |
87-13-8 |
97% |
4.1.14. |
Glacial acetic acid |
64-19-7 |
≥99.7% |
4.1.15. |
Methanol HPLC |
67-56-1 |
≥99.9% |
4.1.16. |
Acetonitrile HPLC |
75-05-8 |
≥99.93% |
4.1.17. |
Hydrochloric acid |
7646-01-0 |
≥37% |
4.1.18. |
Ultrapure water (18 MΩ) |
- Internal standard solution
Preparation of a 2 g/L solution:
Weigh 20 mg of 2, 4, 6-Trimethylphenethylamine hydrochloride (4.1.12)
Dissolve in 10 mL of 0.1 M HCl (5.1)
Storage
The solution is kept at room temperature.
5.1. 0.1 M HCL solution
Preparation of a 0.1 M HCl solution:
Take a sample of approximately 900 ml of ultrapure water (4.1.18) using a graduated cylinder (6.13)
Pour approximately 500 mL of ultrapure water (4.1.18) into a 1 L volumetric flask (6.9)
Take a 100 mL sample of 1M HCl (prepared from the commercial product 4.1.17) using a graduated cylinder (6.11)
Pour the 100 mL of 1 M HCl (4.1.17) into the volumetric flask (6.9)
Top up to 1 L with the remaining ultrapure water
Storage
The solution is kept at room temperature.
5.2. 1M borate buffer
For 100 mL of solution:
Weigh 6.183 g of boric acid (4.1.9)
Dissolve in a beaker (6.2) by adding 80 mL of ultrapure water (measured using the graduated cylinder) (6.11)
Adjust the pH to 9 with a 4N NaOH solution (prepared from the commercial product 4.1.10)
Adjust to 100 mL in a volumetric flask (6.7)
Note: To obtain good dissolution, the crystals of boric acid should dissolve at a pH as low as possible. To do so, NaOH should be added in small doses (by 10 drops from a Pasteur pipette) (6.30) over a period of 3 hours.
Storage
The solution is kept at room temperature.
5.3. HPLC mobile phase
Mobile phase A: 25 mM acetate buffer + 0.02% of sodium azide pH 5.8:
Take a 1.8 L sample of ultrapure water in a 2 L beaker (6.3)
Add 2.86 mL of glacial acetic acid (4.1.14) (thoroughly rinse the tip in the beaker)
Then 0.4 g of sodium azide (4.1.11)
Stir with a magnetic stirrer (6.24)
Adjust the pH to 5.80 with the 4M NaOH using a Pasteur pipette (6.30) (about 6.5 mL)
Adjust to 2000 mL in a 2000 mL volumetric flask (6.10)
Mobile phase B: Acetonitrile/Methanol (80/20):
For 2 L of mobile phase
Take a 400 mL sample of methanol (4.1.15) using a graduated cylinder (6.12) and pour it into a 2 L cap bottles (6.20) and add in the same cap bottles 1600 mL sample of acetonitrile (4.1.16) measured using a graduated cylinder (6.14).
Storage
The solutions are kept at room temperature.
5.4. Biogenic amine standard range
Preparation of solutions A :
Stock solution A at 500 mg/L
Weigh about 50 mg (accurately known weight) of histamine (4.1.1), methylamine (4.1.2), ethylamine (4.1.3), tyramine (4.1.4) and putrescine (4.1.5) and dissolve them in the same 100 mL flask (6.7) with 0.1 M HCl (5.1)
Surrogate solution A at 50 mg/L
Take a 25 mL sample of solution A at 500 mg/L and pour into a 250 mL flask (6.8)
Top up to 250 mL with 0.1 M HCl (5.1)
Surrogate solution A at 40 mg/L
Take a 50 mL sample of 0.1 M HCl (5.1) and pour into a 250 mL flask (6.8)
Top up to 250 mL with the surrogate solution A at 50 mg/L
Preparation of solutions B
Stock solution B at 500 mg/L
Weigh about 50 mg (accurately known weight) of cadaverine (4.1.6), phenethylamine (4.1.7) and isoamylamine (4.1.8) and dissolve them in the same 100 mL flask (6.7) with 0.1 M HCl (5.1)
Surrogate solution B at 50 mg/L
Take a 25 mL sample of solution B to 500 mg/L and pour into a 250 mL flask (6.8)
Top up to 250 mL with 0.1 M HCl (5.1)
Surrogate solution B at 10 mg/L
Take a 50 mL sample of surrogate solution B at 50 mg/L and pour into a 250 mL flask (6.8)
Top up to 250 mL with 0.1 M HCl (5.1)
Combination of solutions A and B - Standard range
In a 100 mL flask (6.7) add 50 mL of solution A at 40 mg/L using a 50 mL volumetric flask (6.6)
Top up to 100 mL with the solution B at 10 mg/L: you obtain the solution at 20 (A) / 5 (B) mg/L
The next table explains how to prepare concentration points for the calibration curve:
Concentration of the initial solution (mg/L) |
Volume of initial solution sampled (mL) |
Adjusted to 100 mL with a 0.1 M HCl solution (mL) |
Concentration of the final solution (mg/L) |
20(A) / 5 (B) |
50 |
50 |
10 (A) / 2.5 (B) |
10(A) / 2.5 (B) |
50 |
50 |
5 (A) / 1.25 (B) |
5(A) / 1.25 (B) |
20 |
80 |
1 (A) / 0.25 (B) |
In this way, four concentrations of biogenic amines are contained in solution A (20, 10, 5 and 1 mg/L), and four concentrations of biogenic amines are contained in solution B (5, 2.5, 1.25 and 0.25 mg/L).
Storage The solutions are kept at –20°C.
- Equipment and apparatus
6.1. 25 mL Beakers
6.2. 250 mL Beakers
6.3. 2000 mL Beakers
6.4. 10 mL volumetric flasks
6.5. 25 mL volumetric flasks
6.6. 50 mL volumetric flasks
6.7. 100 mL volumetric flasks
6.8. 250 mL volumetric flasks
6.9. 1000 mL volumetric flasks
6.10. 2000 mL volumetric flasks
6.11. 100 mL graduated cylinder
6.12. 500 mL graduated cylinder
6.13. 1000 mL graduated cylinder
6.14. 2000 mL graduated cylinder
6.15. 200 μL automatic pipette
6.16. 1 mL automatic pipette
6.17. 5 mL automatic pipette
6.18. 10 mL automatic pipette
6.19. Tips for 1 mL, 5 mL and 10 mL automatic pipette
6.20. 2-litre cap bottles
6.21. Pyrex 10 mL hydrolysis tubes with screw top
6.22. 2 mL screw cap bottles adapted to the auto-sampler
6.23. Scales for weighing from 0 to 205 g
6.24. Magnetic stirrer
6.25. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)
6.26. Data acquisition software
6.27. DAD detector (diode array)
6.28. Octadecyl-type column (for example HP® C18 - HL, 250 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 μm).
6.29. Dry bath at 70 ° C
6.30. Pasteur pipette
6.31. Ultrasonic bath
- Sampling (sample preparation)
This method does not require special sampling in that 1 mL of wine to be analysed is collected and deposited directly into a Pyrex 10 mL hydrolysis tube with a screw cap (6.21) (see procedure).
However, it is recommended to carry out the derivatisation reaction with DEEMM on receipt of the sample because the histamine concentration in wine may reduce over time.
- Procedure
8.1. Test sample
The manipulation must be done under a fume hood because of the toxicity of certain of the reagents.
If the buffer contains borate crystals, heat it to 50°C while stirring (lower initially, until the solution has heated up).
To avoid any risk of adsorption on the tips of the automatic pipettes, it is advisable to use the micropipette as follows:
Pre-wet the cone once with the solution to be sampled
Add the solution to the recipient without rinsing the tip with the contents of the recipient unless otherwise specified
Shake the solutions well before use (especially the frozen wine)
In a Pyrex 10 mL hydrolysis tube with a screw cap (6.21), introduce using suitable micropipettes:
- 1.75 mL of borate buffer (5.2)
- 750 μL of methanol (4.1.15)
- 1 mL of the sample to be derivatised (1 mL automatic pipette) (6.16)
- 40 μL of the internal standard (2,4,6 TPA to 2 g/L) (5.1)
- 30 μL of DEEMM (4.1.13)
Close the tube (fully tighten to avoid any evaporation) and shake manually.
Turn on the dry bath (6.29) to 70°C.
Place the tube in the ultrasonic bath (6.31) for 30 minutes (2 times 15 minutes, stirring every 5 minutes). Always use a plastic rack suitable for the water bath because the derivatisation is unsatisfactory when a metal rack is used.
Heat the reaction mixture to 70°C for 1h in the dry bath (6.29) to degrade the surplus DEEMM.
Turn off the dry bath
After the reaction mixture has returned to room temperature, fill the 2 mL bottles using Pasteur pipettes (6.30) (change Pasteur pipette with each tube). Shake the tubes manually before sampling.
8.2. Operating conditions
The operating conditions below are given as an example.
Mobile phase:
A: 25 mM acetate buffer + 0.02% of sodium azide pH 5.8 :
B: Acetonitrile/Methanol (80/20):
Gradient elution as follows, with a flow rate of 0.9 mL/min:
Time (min) |
% A |
% B |
0 |
90 |
10 |
5 |
90 |
10 |
10 |
83 |
17 |
35 |
60 |
40 |
43 |
28 |
72 |
48 |
18 |
82 |
52 |
0 |
100 |
57 |
0 |
100 |
Column temperature: 15°C
Detection wavelength: 280 nm
Flow rate: 0.9 ml/min
Volume injected: 50 μL
Analysis time: 57 minutes
Identification of biogenic amines:
The biogenic amines are identified by their retention time. To do so, each biogenic amine was analysed individually in order to determine its retention time (Tr).
Amines |
Average Tr (min) |
|
Histamine |
HI |
25.46 |
Methylamine |
ME |
33.11 |
Ethylamine |
ET |
39.00 |
Tyramine |
TY |
41.50 |
Putrescine |
PU |
46.00 |
Cadaverine |
CA |
48.00 |
Phenethylamine |
PH |
48.75 |
Isoamylamine |
IS |
50.25 |
Internal standard |
2,4,6-TPA |
54.75 |
- Calculations (Results)
Bias caused by the uncertainty on the derivatisation yield and the injection volume can be corrected using the internal standard.
Once the value of the peak has been corrected, the concentration of biogenic amine is calculated based on the slope value of the standard range of the corresponding biogenic amine. To do so, for each series of analyses a standard range is also derivatised and injected.
The results are expressed in mg/L to one figure after the decimal point.
- Quality Control
Quality controls can be carried out with certified reference materials, wines whose characteristics are derived from consensus or wines to which standard additions have been regularly made during the analytical series and in accordance with the accompanying control charts.
- Characteristics of the method: intralaboratory validation parameters
The validation parameters were determined according to [4].
11.1. Linearity
The approach chosen for the study of linearity is that of comparing the residual standard deviations from a linear regression model and a second-order polynomial regression model.
This study was conducted on two different wines spiked with biogenic amines at concentrations of 0, 1, 5, 10, and 20 mg / L (solution A) and 0, 0.25, 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/L (solution B).
Summary of the results for biogenic amines:
biogenic Amine |
S res Linear |
S’res Order 2 |
DS 2 |
PG |
F (5%) |
Conclusion |
|
Methylamine |
0.766 |
0.606 |
3.218 |
8.757 |
4.75 |
Linear |
|
Ethylamine |
0.371 |
0.371 |
0.140 |
1.014 |
Linear |
||
Tyramine |
1.065 |
1.065 |
1.135 |
1.000 |
Linear |
||
Putrescine |
0.524 |
0.523 |
0.286 |
1.043 |
Linear |
||
Cadaverine |
0.276 |
0.267 |
0.134 |
1.881 |
Linear |
||
Phenethylamine |
0.251 |
0.248 |
0.082 |
1.328 |
Linear |
||
Isoamylamine |
0.216 |
0.215 |
0.055 |
1.199 |
Linear |
||
Histamine |
0.591 |
0.589 |
0.316 |
1.084 |
Linear |
||
11.2. Specificity
The principle of specificity measurement consists in examining the regression line r = a + bv and verifying that slope b is equal to 1 ( <) and that intercept point a is equal to 0 ( <). The hypotheses are tested using a t-test associated with the 1% risk of error.
The value of , bilateral [p−2, 1%] associated with the 1% risk of error for 3 degrees of freedom is 4.541.
Summary of the results for biogenic amines
biogenic Amine |
Wine A |
Wine B |
Wine C |
Wine D |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Methylamine |
4.482 |
2.321 |
2.933 |
0.013 |
1.563 |
0.007 |
5.199 |
2.864 |
Ethylamine |
0.411 |
0.002 |
0.081 |
0.010 |
0.546 |
10.556 |
0.169 |
2.537 |
Tyramine |
1.834 |
0.005 |
0.636 |
0.005 |
2.151 |
4.485 |
3.420 |
37.419 |
Putrescine |
7.605 |
0.041 |
0.604 |
0.000 |
3.257 |
0.064 |
2.135 |
0.011 |
Cadaverine |
5.499 |
0.033 |
1.719 |
1.314 |
10.929 |
0.049 |
8.466 |
0.026 |
Phenethylamine |
3.348 |
0.016 |
1.265 |
0.001 |
10.238 |
0.034 |
5.925 |
0.009 |
Isoamylamine |
12.980 |
0.016 |
2.297 |
0.004 |
12.996 |
0.020 |
11.121 |
0.000 |
Histamine |
4.978 |
0.250 |
1.222 |
0.006 |
3.128 |
0.014 |
1.229 |
0.004 |
11.3. Repeatability
For this repeatability study, seven different red wines were selected, and three different repetitions were performed on each. Concentrations were from 0.5 mg/L to 15 mg/L depending on the biogenic amine and the wine.
biogenic Amine |
Sr (mg/L) |
r (mg/L) |
Validation range (mg/L) |
Methylamine |
0.335 |
0.937 |
3 - 16 |
Ethylamine |
0.173 |
0.486 |
2 - 7 |
Tyramine |
0.276 |
0.773 |
2 - 20 |
Putrescine |
0.500 |
1.400 |
7 - 26 |
Cadaverine |
0.025 |
0.069 |
0.2 - 0.8 |
Phenethylamine |
0.028 |
0.079 |
0.3 - 1.1 |
Isoamylamine |
0.017 |
0.048 |
0.1 - 0.8 |
Histamine |
0.108 |
0.303 |
5 - 16 |
11.4. Reproducibility
For this reproductibility study, three different red wines were selected, and two repetitions were performed with each.
biogenic Amine |
Sr (mg/L) |
R (mg/L) |
Validation range (mg/L) |
Methylamine |
0.533 |
1.492 |
3 - 16 |
Ethylamine |
0.884 |
2.475 |
2 - 7 |
Tyramine |
0.341 |
0.955 |
2 - 20 |
Putrescine |
0.419 |
1.172 |
7 - 26 |
Cadaverine |
0.172 |
0.482 |
0.2 - 0.8 |
Phenethylamine |
0.053 |
0.150 |
0.3 - 1.1 |
Isoamylamine |
0.056 |
0.157 |
0.1 - 0.8 |
Histamine |
1.333 |
3.732 |
5 - 16 |
11.5. Limits of detection (LOD) and limits of quantification (LOQ)
According to an intralaboratory study using the method of successive dilutions from a solution to 0.5 mg/L serially diluted to 0.01 mg/L :
Amines |
LD (mg/L) |
LQ (mg/L) |
|
Histamine |
HI |
0.167 |
0.500 |
Methylamine |
ME |
0.083 |
0.250 |
Ethylamine |
ET |
0.150 |
0.450 |
Tyramine |
TY |
0.078 |
0.235 |
Putrescine |
PU |
0.033 |
0.098 |
Cadaverine |
CA |
0.160 |
0.480 |
Phenethylamine |
PH |
0.032 |
0.096 |
Isoamylamine |
IS |
0.007 |
0.020 |
- Bibliography
- Gomez-Alonzo S., Hermosin-Gutierrez I., Garcia-Romero E., 2007. Simultaneous HPLC analysis of biogenic amines, amino acids, and ammonium Ion as Aminoenone derivatives in wine and beer samples. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 55, 608-613.
- Tricard C., Cazabeil J.-M., Salagoïti M.H. (1991): dosage des amines biogènes dans les vins par HPLC, Analusis, 19, M53-M55.
- RECUEIL DES METHODES INTERNATIONALES D'ANALYSES - OIV, Amines biogènes par HPLC, Méthode OIV-MA-AS315-18 , Analyse des amines biogènes des moûts et des vins par HPLC (Résolution OIV-Oeno 346-2009).
- "Guide pratique pour la validation, le contrôle qualité et l’estimation de l’incertitude d’une méthode d’analyse œnologique alternative". Oeno Resolution 10/2005. OIV. October 2005. www.oiv.int.